Movie Review: Ratchet and Clank – At Least With Results this Bad, We Won’t be Subjected to a Sequel

After being thoroughly delighted by Keanu, who would have thought my movie going experience would take such a terrible turn? But it did, when some Hollywood producers broke the golden rule of adaptations. Never adapt a movie from a game. Yes, you can do it in the other direction, but as far as I’m concerned, to date no one has given me a convincing movie adaptation of a video game or board game I played. Clue, Mortal Kombat, Wing Commander and Lara Croft: Tomb Raider all have one thing in common. They could never live up to the experience of actually playing the game.

Anyway, in this film, two unlikely heroes (some kind of robot, and a fox thing) team up to fight an evil alien overlord intent on universal destruction. The team then teams up with another team (I know, right?), made of seizure inducing bright colors known as The Galactic Rangers, to save the day.

Again, not nearly as fun as playing the 2002 version of the game. They didn’t even try to deviate from the game story. The storyline is pulled right from it and they changed nothing at all. It’s some pretty damn lazy storytelling, if you ask me.

The animation is good for a video game…but terrible for a movie. I don’t want to go to the movies and feel like I’ve been sent back to 1991, watching my brother hog the Nintendo. I was bored when it happened then, and I was bored in the theater watching this.


You know what it feels like? It feels like someone recorded them beating the game on their PlayStation and expects us to buy it as a movie…even without Pew Die Pie making nonsensical, but weirdly delightful noises in the background. Well I ain’t buying it.

This was a lazy, phoned in effort that cashes in on the nostalgia of aging Millennials while trying to do as little work as possible. You don’t get any more information here than you do in the video game, which leads me to wonder, why watch the movie? I mean, I liked Ratchet and Clank the video game, but not so much that I really cared enough to see them on the big screen.


Also, 94 minutes for a recycled story is a bit excessive. With most movies topping out at 80, it’s a bit stupid to add and additional ten onto the industry standard. Maybe it took the ‘animator’ a bit longer to beat the game.

Whatever, I can’t call this worth the watch and audiences aren’t either. This didn’t even come within a whisper of the top five at the box office and earned a paltry $5 million to date. At least with results this bad, we won’t be subjected to a sequel. If you’re feeling nostalgic, just go play the game.

We Gave it: 1 Star: Official Movie Trailer and Movie Poster Below

1 star

[youtube id=”MOzY_q0lFHM” width=”680″ height=”383″]

ratchet and clank movie poster

Movie Review: Dirty Grandpa – This Literally Might Be The Unfunniest Film of the Year.

hero_Dirty-Grandpa-2016 - 02FEB2016

When paired correctly Zac Efron can be an excellent comic actor. When paired correctly Robert De Niro can be a great dramatic actor and a great comic actor. When paired together, it seems some kind of weird chemical reaction happens that makes these two stars just a little bit irritating and a whole lot of disturbing.

The premise is this. Jason Kelly [Zac Efron] is one week away from marrying his boss’s uber-controlling daughter, putting him on the fast track for a partnership at the law firm he works at. However, when the straight-laced Jason is tricked into driving his foul-mouthed grandfather, Dick [Robert De Niro], to Daytona for spring break, his pending nuptials are suddenly in jeopardy. This is a wacky road trip/buddy movie that winds up feeling awkward simply due to the mismatched cast.

Road trip comedies, provided they are hilarious and have the right casting, don’t have to be complex or intelligent. They can be really stupid and really thin, but still be enjoyable. Consider movies like “The Sure Thing,” “Little Miss Sunshine” and “National Lampoon’s Vacation.” None of the plots are particularly complex, but they work because of the actors and because of the dialog.

What didn’t make them work was endless dick jokes.

It was like the writers went out of their way to make every single character as repellant as possible. Every last one of them has some deep seated, controversial issues, whether they’re selling drugs to kids or trying to molest aging pensioners.

Efron clearly made an effort to give his character heart and sympathy. It’s one of his first times playing the straight man in a buddy comedy and I felt like he gave it his all. Surprisingly, where it fell apart was De Niro. De Niro is an excellent actor, as long as he’s playing ‘straight’. The responsible mobsters, the overbearing father, the strict mentor, these are all roles he shines in. The ‘kooky grandpa’ role is not one of them. There’s just something so uncomfortable about watching De Niro trying to get laid.

136465pcn-zacshirtless - 02FEB2016

I’m not a fan of movies that depend on being crude to be funny, because crude isn’t always funny. Sometimes it’s just crude. See Andrew Dice Clay as an example. I have to say, if this is writer John Phillips best effort, I have little hope for the upcoming Bad Santa 2.

In a movie like this, it’s important to like the characters. While Efron works to be likeable, De Niro is that creepy old dude in the bar, standing in the corner, watching girls young enough to be his granddaughter dance, while he drools slightly. He’s not funny. He’s just gross. Honestly, if I met this character in real life, I probably would have maced him while blowing my rape whistle.

This literally might be the unfunniest film of the year. A script devoid of humor, and leads that come across as unlikable, make this movie one that’s sure to earn a Golden Raspberry nomination. This is not even remotely worth the watch. In fact, it’s one I wish I could unwatch.

We Gave it: 1 Star: Official Movie Trailer and Movie Poster Below

1 star

[youtube id=”aZSzMIFZT7Q” width=”680″ height=”383″]

FIN04_DirtyGrandpa_1Sht_Flex_VF-mtv-1452102091 - 02FEB2016

Movie Review: Paranormal Activity: The Ghost Dimension – A Recycled Mishmash Of Garbage

635705790165292767-XXX-PA5-FF-004-DCB-74005934-620x400 - 07NOV2015

Paranormal Activity: The Ghost Dimension is by far one of the finest movies to be released in years. It is a well written, intelligent film that by no means uses a completely overused premise in order to squeeze more cash out of a dying franchise. This film is a completely fresh, and has a unique take on the genre that has not used the same basic synopsis as the past few movies.

Please note that this review is being written from The Opposite Dimension, where everything I say should be taken with a heavy dose of sarcasm.

Do I really need to summarize this? Are we all not familiar with all the other Paranormal Activity movies? Just for the sake of anyone who isn’t familiar with these movies…like any Amish readers out there… the premise of this. Family moves into spooky house. Sees spooky things. Sets up about 30k worth of video equipment and then paranormal activity happens.

23-ghost-dimension.w529.h352 07NOV2015

The acting in this one? It was so bad, I thought I was watching a porn without any of the fun bits. No joke, I haven’t seen acting this bad since I watched Ginger Lynn in Vice Academy. The only difference between this and that was that I actually cared about Gingers Lynn’s character in Vice Academy. Sure, I was more worried she’d get herpes than killed by a ghost, but at least I cared.

I didn’t even care about these characters enough to hate them. All I could muster up was a heavy feeling of apathy.

The graphics in this one were awesome, though. There was one point that I thought those bananas were going to come right out of the screen.

Wait a minute…

Never mind, I’m thinking of the new version of Fruit Ninja I both installed and played on my phone in the theater while watching this movie. It was literally so bad that no one cared. In fact, many were far more invested in my game and my quest to break 1000 points and win the magic sizzle sword, than they were invested in this movie.

first-look-paranormal-activity-the-ghost-dimension-trailer-will-scare-you-sh-tless-472431 - 07NOV2015

Really, really bad. It’s another 90 minutes of bumping around in the dark and waiting for something scary to happen. This time we’re all so desensitized to jump scares that nothing in the movie qualifies as scary. So apparently, they just decided to toss in some Poltergeist stuff as well, complete with a possessed child and a portal to another dimension in a kid’s room.

It’s really nothing more than a recycled mishmash of garbage that we’ve all been sick of since Paranormal Activity 2. Nothing about it is scary. Nothing is fresh and new. They added some higher end effects so they could show something that looks like evil black mold.

If they think that’s scary, they should see my bathtub.

It’s just not worth the watch, but because these movies cost like $8 to make, they’ll probably keep making them until I’m well into my 90s and even the ghosts on camera are using walkers.

So for the movie, not worth that watch. But the new version of Fruit Ninja? I’m giving that 5 out of 5 stars.

We Gave it: 1 Star: Official Movie Trailer and Movie Poster Below

1 star

[youtube id=”Y9Jy2T0uQ9Y” width=”680″ height=”383″]

 Paranormal_Activity_The_ghost_dimension_Poster - 07NOV2015

Movie Review: Jem and the Holograms – It Was Crap, and Not Just Crap, But Insulting Crap

288E7F9200000578-0-image-a-5_1431470694097 06NOV2015

Being a good 20 years older than the vast majority of an audience is never a comfortable feeling. Though for this one, I glossed over my unease in order to revel in some nostalgia. As a child of the 80s, I grew up with Jem and the Holograms and was really looking forward to seeing one of my favorite cartoons go live action. I was willing to sit with a bunch of giggling tweens to make that happen.

Then I watched it and said, “Whoever wrote this clearly never saw the show.”

Aubrey Peoples (ABC’s Nashville) plays Jerrica/Jem, a teen who dreams of sharing her music with the world and lives with widowed mom (Molly Ringwald), younger sister Kimber (Stefanie Scott) and foster sisters Aja (Hayley Kyoko) and Shana (Aurora Perrineau) somewhere in generic California. After posting Jem singing a song on YouTube, the teen is thrust into stardom. She catches the eye of Erica Raymond (Juliette Lewis, enjoyably chewing the scenery), the rapacious CEO of Starlight Music, Jem is presented with an offer she can’t refuse. On account of her mom is about to lose the house.

288E7F6D00000578-0-image-a-8_1431470718527 06NOV2015

They ruined it. There is no sign whatsoever of the actual holograms that made Jem so flipping popular to begin with. It was a sci-fi show. Jem lived a secret life and with a touch of her magic earring, became a superstar rocker. She could disappear just as easily and used that to her advantage when dealing with her real arch nemesis. The Misfits.

The closest thing this movie has to sci-fi was a nonsensical robot that made beeping noises.

Are you flipping kidding me? You know why no one ever made this into a movie before? Because they didn’t have the technology to create it. Computer animation, which could have been used heavily in this, wasn’t around yet. Then, we finally got the technology to do this series justice and what did they do?

288E7F4400000578-0-image-a-3_1431470666522 06NOV2015

Stripped out everything that made the show unique and turned it in Hannah Goddamn Montana.

There is not a damn cliché they didn’t show into this one. Jem learning the hard way the music industry is cruel and friendship is more important. Having no choice but to help because the house is going into foreclosure and everyone’s depending on her. Her ‘music’ being cheapened because of commercialism.

And toss in a bunch of testimonials from teens who don’t exist, gushing about how much Jem means to them, and seriously…I was ready to burn down the theater.

It was an insult to the old cartoon, and too cutesy, cutesy, sugary sweet to be accepted by teens today. It was just plain stupid and obnoxious. This movie literally could have been any other movie. Nothing about it made it Jem. Seriously, it would have been like naming “Entourage” “The Transformers” and expecting no one to notice.

It was crap, and not just crap, but insulting crap. They shamelessly used the name of a popular 80s show and then made no attempt to actually adhere to the formula of the original.

And that’s why it flopped. A movie that cost about $5 million to make pulled in an embarrassing $1 million its opening weekend and never even placed at the box office.

And I’m glad. Because that’s what you get for ruining my childhood favorites.

So Jem the original, worth the watch. This pile of garbage? Not even remotely. I’m not sure what it is, but it sure as hell ain’t Jem.

We Gave it: 1 Star: Official Movie Trailer and Movie Poster Below

1 star

[youtube id=”mfa9t-TeeVU” width=”680″ height=”383″]

2899539100000578-0-image-a-2_1431470659114 06NOV2015

Movie Review: Return to Sender – Boring and Exhausting With No Payoff


I saw Return to Sender for one reason; Rosamund Pike. She’s the Academy Award nominee from the hugely successful “Gone Girl” and I was so impressed with her playing the duplicitous Amy Dunn that I decided to give her second feature a shot.

I regret that.

Pike plays Miranda, a nurse who is the victim of a violent sexual assault. The assault disrupts her normal, orderly life where she works as trauma nurse and is trying to sell her home. Because of the attack, she has a tremor in her hand making her unable to work in a surgery center, and no one wants to buy her house because it’s a crime scene. Even after her attacker is convicted and sentenced to prison, Miranda can’t get closure. So she decides to start visiting him. The atmosphere after this is dual natured, and a bit of regurgitated Gone Girl. We don’t know whether Miranda is truly trying to understand her attacker, or if she’s simply setting him up for a greater revenge.

74884185229055376396  28AUG2015

They don’t play off the suspense well. The movie is like 2 hours of tedious “will she or won’t she” questions, and ends on an anti-climactic note. The tension isn’t good. It’s boring and exhausting, and there’s literally no payoff for waiting for the end.

This is a queasy exploitation flick wrapped in an ‘art’ package. They pulled in Pike to give this movie credibility, but it’s nothing more than some gritty, poorly shot torture porn wrapped up in a pretty package. That’s what it is. It’s a new version of “I Spit on Your Grave” one of the original rape-revenge flicks.

But Pike should have been warned prior to making this slightly tamer copycat movie that every single one of the leads in I Spit on You Grave never got another part in a major movie. They literally cursed their careers by making a movie that bad.

I can see this happening again. Rosamund Pike may have just shot herself in the foot. I don’t know what she was thinking when she accepted this roll. I don’t know who her manager is, who told her this was a good idea, or if she got in debt to the mob and this movie was the only way to pay it off, but this movie was an utter mistake. She might have just ruined her career.

P7BBYqY  28AUG2015

And Nick Nolte? Yeah, he served no purpose in the movie, other than making me question if he’d decided to go Amish with his giant beard. He mainly just plods around, warning Miranda to stay away from the man who attacked her while Miranda tries to put him at ease. Maybe Voltage owed him billing in a movie, but honestly, his character did nothing to advance the plot.

It’s crap. It’s cheap exploitation filth designed to draw in pervy audiences, and presented under the guise of art in an attempt to give it respectability. This is the kind of movie I would expect on late night cable, not from Rosamund Pike.

Despite that, I still think Pike is a talent. I’m just thinking that she might want to leave this mess off her resume because it was not worth the watch, not even remotely.

We Gave it: 1 Star: Official Movie Trailer and Movie Poster Below

1 star

[youtube id=”KCXcbaYk7-o” width=”680″ height=”383″]

Return to sender Official Movie Poster -  28AUG2015

Movie Review: The Fantastic Four (2015) – The Critics Were Right, It’s Terrible


Great, another remake of the Fantastic Four. That’s never happened before, except in 1994, 2005, 2007 and just a guess, but there’s probably at least five other Fantastic Four adaptations underway. This one isn’t a stand out, unless you’re looking for something that’s stand out bad.

If that’s the case, this fits the bill.

This one, directed by John Trank, never really stood a chance. Many anonymous insiders have been trashing this movie since before it was released. Even Trank complained that he had a ‘fantastic’ version of the movie that was subsequently ruined but 20th Century Fox. Just about everyone involved seemed completely uncommitted to this project.

This review is going to be spoiler heavy, because it’s literally not worth watching the 80 minutes of tedious backstory, followed by the 20 minutes of equally tedious climax.

First off Miles Teller plays Mr. Fantastic. This 28-year-old actor seems a bit young for the role, so they fixed it by…making his character even younger? For some reason they portray Reed Richards as an 18-year-old self-taught world class genius who discovers the secret of inter dimensional travel during a school science fair.

Also with him is Ben Grimm (aka the Thing) who plays a boy bullied by his older brother. As if to shoehorn in his catch phrase, they make it so the older brother yells out “it’s clobbering time” just about every time he’s about to beat on his kid brother, which is kind of depressing

Ok, anyway back to the science fair. Of course wackiness ensures when they accidently break the gymnasium. Luckily, Dr. Franklin Storm (Reg E. Cathey) and his adopted daughter, Sue (Kate Mara) just happen to show up to announce they are also attempting to master inter-dimensional travel. So Reed gets a full scholarship that conveniently places him closer to his love interest.



There’s a bunch of other characters as well, including an entirely forgettable bad guy, but I really stopped paying attention about half way in. It just gets to be too much, like they really want to make sure they shove in as many back story moments as possible in order to cash in on the nostalgia. The problem is, this film is so far removed from the original that it bears little resemblance to any of the original characters.

The cast was utterly forgettable, the screenplay poorly written and ridiculous even by superhero movie standards and the entire thing dragged on so long that half the time I forgot what the point was by the time they reached it.

It just didn’t work. Making all the actors so seemingly young, while trying to shove in too many origin stories, made everything feel rushed and idiotic. I can kind of see why this movie was getting trashed even by the people that made it. The actors sleepwalked through their roles, in a script so filled with clichés and plot holes it could be used as a colander.

I can’t give it a worth the watch. In fact, I hope the Fantastic Four perfect their inter-dimensional technology so I can find a new place where this movie never existed.
We Gave it: 1 Star: Official Movie Trailer and Movie Poster Below

1 star

[youtube id=”POBI7OhGB18″ width=”680″ height=”383″]


Movie Review: Area 51 – Thank God I didn’t Have to Leave The House To Watch This Heaping Pile

unnamed - 29MAY2015

Let’s admit that Area 51 is a place that has gotten a lot of movies made about it, despite the fact that it doesn’t exists. There, I said it. Suck it conspiracy theorists. It doesn’t exist. Deal with it. So I have to admit, I wasn’t exactly intrigued by the premise, but I gave it a shot anyway.

If only I had a time machine. Not so I could stop myself from seeing this movie, but so I could go back in time and stop Oren Peli from ever being born. That way, he would have never made Paranormal Activity, it would have never become a hit and he would have never been able to beat the premise to death.

But I don’t have a time machine so I did in fact, watch this shameless rehash.

The premise is this. Reid Warner is desperate to discover the secrets of Area 51. Because he’s apparently unaware that the internet exists and is unable to Google them, he heads on out to the Nevada desert. Of course, he gets some buddies to come along. We have Ben Rovner and Darrin Bragg, along with a completely unnecessary female character Jelena Nik, whose dad just happened to be a rogue scientist for Area 51. So off they go, into the desert, armed with nothing more than a bunch of night vision capable cameras.

Well, actually, they make a stop at Hooters first. Nope, not making this up. They stop there to test out their equipment and share all their innermost feelings with the cameras for absolutely no reason at all.

area51stillks003-620x400 - 29MAY2015

2015-05-23-area-51 - 29MAY2015

Then they go out to the desert and you eagerly await their preferably extremely violent deaths. Well, I imagine they were violent. I don’t really know, because this is all filmed in crappy found footage…in the dark.

It was like being forced to watch a marathon edition of Ghost Hunters. I hate Ghost Hunters. It’s one of the few times I actually want the ghosts to win.

Can I entirely blame Peli for trying to replicate his success with Paranormal Activity? Not entirely. His problem was that this sat on the shelf for five years. During that time, found footage was done to death, revived and done to death again. It’s just not scary anymore.

Found Footage is not a real filmmaking technique. It’s a fad and a silly one at that. It is the slap bracelet of the film world. It was good at first, but then it started to wear away and now all it does is cut your wrists…or make you want to.

This is a phoned in effort with terrible acting, scripting and storytelling. The majority of it is watching the guys try to get to Area 51. When they do, you’re plunged into darkness, watching them occasionally bump into things while allegedly scary things happen.

You don’t need to leave the house to watch this heaping pile. The filmmakers wisely decided to release it on Amazon Instant Video, probably hoping that people will accidentally purchase it. Because I have to say, I do not understand why anyone would watch this on purpose.

We Gave it: 1 Star: Official Movie Trailer and Movie Poster Below

1 star


[youtube id=”jg1Jt2Ft6xg” width=”680″ height=”383″]

219330 - 29MAY2015

Movie Review: Paul Blart: Mall Cop 2 – I’ve Honestly Never Been in a Theater So Silent.

mall cop 2 - 29APR2014

This movie confused me a bit. I thought it was supposed to be a comedy but it felt more like a commercial for the Wynn Resort in Vegas. I counted, and there were approximately 7000 helicopter shots of the outside of the resort in the movie. Those shots far outnumber the laughs.

Of those, I counted four.

In this completely unnecessary sequel, Paul Blart’s life is again in shambles. Remember all the happy stuff that happened to him after the first movie? Yeah, that lasted like a week. Blart’s wife left him 6 days after the wedding, while his beloved mommy dearest was run over by a milk truck. All this is told in voice over narration, as I imagine even covering this movie in 0 calorie chocolate couldn’t make Jayma Mays and Shirley Knight reprise their roles. So Blart takes off to Vegas with his delightful daughter in tow. Of course, the Wynn hotel where they will be staying just happens to be hosting bad guy Vincent (Neal McDonough) who is planning on stealing a casino’s art treasures. Then wackiness ensues.

Really, really unfunny wackiness. Remember all the stuff that made you laugh during the first movie? Blart jumping around, doing really slow rolls and trying to look like a badass? Remember how funny that was?

Hold on to that feeling if you can, because by the end of this movie, you won’t find it funny at all anymore. All attempts at humor are made through over the top actors and over the top antics. Everything that was clever in the first movie has grown tired and tedious by the second.

I’ve honestly never been in a theater so silent. I don’t think I even heard a chuckle. I’m starting to understand why Sony elected to sneak this one out and not offer advance critic reviews. It was just plain bad.

Paul blart Mall cop 2 moive still 4 - 28APR2015

mall cop 2 movie still - 28APR2015

Speaking of Sony, they managed to cram their name on just about every piece of electronics in the movie. Watches, cameras, cell phones. If there had been a pregnancy test, it would have said “Sony” on it.

Kevin James continued to play the lovable buffoon character that made him famous, but really, that character isn’t quite so loveable anymore. His ‘all time loser’ act is getting pretty tired. It would be nice to see him win one for a change.

They should have never made a sequel. It was completely unnecessary. The whole mall cop premise was funny, but you take the mall cop out of the mall and he’s just another fat tourist in Vegas. Forgettable, a little ridiculous and not watchable.

This was a poor storyline trotted about by a company who just wanted to grab as much cash from this premise that they could. The problem was they already robbed us blind in the first one. This was not a story that needed to be told twice. It was finished off quite nicely the first time around.

I don’t know what’s sadder. This movie, or Kevin James desperately trying to hold onto the last few pieces of his fading career.

We Gave it: 1 Star: Official Movie Trailer and Movie Poster Below

1 star

[youtube id=”b_ld3IJ0sUU” width=”680″ height=”383″]

Paul Blart Mall Cop 2 Movie Poster

Movie Review: Chappie (2015) – Too Gory for Children, and Too Stupid for Adults,


Artificial intelligence movies are popular, because we don’t know what would really happen. After all, the closest thing we have to artificial intelligence in the real world is Google, and most of us use it to look up fetish porn. But what happens when that artificial intelligence also has self awareness? Chappie tries, albeit poorly, to examine this.

To classify this movie, I’d call it one part Robocop and one part Short Circuit. The film is set in the dystopian future, where life is scary and crime is handled by a bunch of emotionless robots. When their creator, Deon, decides to take the next step and try to create a robot who can’t just fight criminals, but can think and asses them, Chappie is born. Then, a bunch of thugs get their hands on Chappie and decided to program him for nefarious methods.

I found the movie had a bit of demographic confusion going on, as though the creators couldn’t decide whether it was for adults or children. It feels like half a fairy tale and half an action movie.

1251623 - Chappie

1251623 - Chappie

Plot holes abound. The biggest one? A group of criminals, who like to steal things, have their hands on a million dollar robot and instead of selling it, they slap a bunch of gold chains on it and decide to just hang out. Our main character Deon also never thinks to tell anyone that Chappie has been stolen. I don’t know why. That’s never delved into. Any plot holes there are, they gloss right over.

The dialog was wooden, silly and sometimes just embarrassing. The motivations of the characters are completely unrealistic. I get that science fiction is far fetched, but you can’t gloss over basic plot holes like character motivation.

Come on, these people live in slums and they steal a million dollar robot. Why are they not selling it? It’s not like there’s no market for it. Another bad guy, Vincent, is tossed in there and I’m sure he’d be happy to part with a couple million for it.

This is the most confusing movie I’ve seen since Tank Girl. It’s too gory for children, and too stupid for adults, so who’s exactly supposed to watch it? Robots?

Chappie gives us a nonsensical plot. A scary robot that’s supposed to be sweet. A security company who apparently keeps all their high tech security in an unlocked barn. Silly dialog and characters that are far too stupid to be criminals. That’s really saying something. It’s poorly written, genre confused and aimed at a non-existent audience.

What’s really blowing my mind right now is that it’s sitting in the number 1 spot at the box office. Most of the time, I can predict what people will think of a movie, even if I know critics will hate it. In this one, I didn’t see Chappie coming. Maybe it was the utter lack of new releases? Maybe seating for Focus was sold out? Either way, this is not a movie that earned its spot at the box office.

When it comes right down to it, Chappie is nothing more than a pile of loud garbage.

We Gave it: 1 Star: Official Movie Trailer and Movie Poster Below

1 star

[youtube id=”l6bmTNadhJE” width=”680″ height=”383″]


Movie Review: Project Almanac (2015) -You will be dumber for having watched it

Project Almanac Movie Review Scene 1

Project Almanac is a paradox in and of itself. It’s a time travel movie that has been time traveling around since 2014. Initially, the movie was called Welcome to Yesterday, marketed heavily under that title, then disappeared inexplicably, only to show up again in 2015 under the name Project Almanac.

In this one, a group of teenagers build a time machine out of what appears to be product placements. Then, these kids, who are smart enough to build a time machine, can’t seem to figure out that when you change stuff that happens in the past, it changes the future too. Because apparently, these kids have never seen a time travel movie.

First off, yes, I know that time travel is far fetched. I get that. But in a good time travel movie, even a humorous one, they at least attempt to make the science believable. They recognize paradoxes and they show why one simple thing changes everything. They don’t go “well, David is dating the head cheerleader, so we all have cancer now.”

Project Almanac Review Scene Still 2

Project Almanac Review Scene still 3

Look, I’m not looking for Stephen Hawking to show up and explain string theory. I’m just looking for an explanation, and not implausible plot twists in a science fiction movie. The science of this movie was about as believable as Sharknado. If you’re going to make something small change things, at least make it understandable as to why it would change things.

Of course, you have a bunch of 25 years olds playing teenagers, including the requisite girl who is just one of the guys, the nerd who doesn’t look like a nerd and his ‘just on the right side of nerdy’ friends. The cast isn’t memorable at all and the acting was a few steps above a high school play.

To make this movie even more irritating, it’s done in shaky, artless, useless, lazy found footage. You know what I’d do if I had a time machine? I’d travel to 1999, find the makers of The Blair Witch Project and convince those idiots of the irreversible damage they were doing to cinema in general with their dumb, dumb movie. Then, I would take all copies of the Blair Witch Project, I would put them in a submarine and I would sink them all the way to the bottom of the sea where they could never hurt anyone again.

Then maybe, just maybe, every idiot with an iPhone wouldn’t think they could be a director too.

This movie is like a really dumb person who tries to convince everyone they have a genius IQ. We all know one person like that. They walk around, narrowly avoiding drinking bleach and wandering into traffic, and then are like ‘yeah, but I took an IQ test online and it said I was a genius”.

This movie is that dumb person. And you will be dumber for having watched it. My suggestion is that the producers go back to 2014 and convince the makers to release this film where it really belonged…in the bottom of a garbage can.

We Gave it: 1 Star: Official Movie Trailer and Movie Poster Below

1 star

[youtube id=”TGuLpPldJZA” width=”680″ height=”383″]

09FEB2015 - 9